The Office of Institutional Research provides leadership and support for institutional reporting compliance, data-driven, decision making, and evaluation efforts for the Marywood University community. We work collaboratively with University constituents to ensure that the data and analysis provided meets their need for planning and assisting institutional effectiveness.
In the spring of 2024, the Core Curriculum committee approved a new curriculum that addresses 12 distinct learning outcomes that develop competencies in essential and widely-applicable skills grounded in Marywood’s Mission and Core Values.
In the spring of 2025, the Academic Council voted to adopt the Core Curriculum learning outcomes as university-wide outcomes that would be assessed primarily within the core curriculum but reinforced throughout the disciplines as well as in co-curricular pursuits.
Within the context of the university-wide outcomes, graduate programs emphasize outcomes in their own disciplinary framework.
Core Outcomes were developed from the nationally recognized LEAP Essential Learning Outcomes, The Middle States Commission on Higher Education's general education standards, and the credit requirements of the PA Department of Education and are regularly assessed.
Each year, the Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness publishes a Fact Book to present concise tabular trend information on Marywood's students, personnel, finances, and facilities.
The Fact Book is a source of information on important institutional measures, in a format that is easily accessible to all members of the Marywood community.
The Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness collects, analyzes, and interprets data about Marywood.
These data are then used to guide University planning and decision-making.
Data on graduation rates are consistent with changes in Student Right to Know regulations.
The Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness has created several interactive custom reports to help make it easier for faculty, staff, and administrators to visualize institutional data in a user-friendly platform. The visualizations are based on our IPEDS data and include information on undergraduate and graduate enrollment by gender, race, and program.
The Common Data Set (CDS) initiative is a collaborative effort among data providers in the higher education community and publishers as represented by the College Board, Peterson’s, and U.S. News and World Report. The combined goal of this collaboration is to improve the quality and accuracy of information provided to all involved in a student transition into higher education, as well as to reduce the reporting burden on data providers.
The CDS is a set of standards and definitions of data items rather than a survey instrument or set of data represented in a database. Each of the higher education surveys conducted by the participating publishers incorporates items from the CDS as well as unique items proprietary to each publisher. Consequently, the publishers’ surveys differ in that they utilize varying numbers of items from CDS.
Those who report data for their colleges are urged to abide by the definitions and the cohorts specified when answering CDS items. They are also urged to use the answers to CDS items to respond to the numerous survey requests and to publish the CDS on their websites.
The goals of the Common Data Set Initiative are:
Development of clear, standard data items and definitions in order to determine a specific cohort relevant to each item.
Data items and definitions used by the U.S. Department of Education in its higher education surveys often serve as a guide in the continued development of the CDS.
Common Data Set items undergo broad review by the CDS Advisory Board as well as by data providers representing secondary schools and two- and four-year colleges. Feedback from those who utilize the CDS also is considered throughout the annual review process.
The Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness gathers information about student experiences while they are attending Marywood University and beyond. The University participates in large-scale nationally benchmarked and community based surveys. Results are used to improve the quality of programs, services, and campus climate.
The systematic and recurring review of academic and professional departments at Marywood University is an essential element of their ongoing efforts to improve the student experience. Marywood accomplishes this objective through critical reflection, self-assessment, and strategic planning consistent with their Mission Statement and Core Values. This review can be met through discipline specific accreditation or this review process.
The review process engages input from various constituencies on campus to obtain a fair and balanced appraisal of a department’s strengths and areas for improvement. Information gathered as part of this review process will help to enhance Marywood’s understanding of the needs of a department, ensure a quality educational experience for students, and allow for the use of evidence-based guidance for administrative decision-making.
In addition, this review process is used to help Marywood University meet the standards of accreditation set forth by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE).
The systematic tracking and recurring evaluation of assessment data and changes made within departments to meet strategic objectives and learning outcomes is essential to the functioning of academic departments and academic support areas. The process of tracking and evaluation can be completed through reports made to accrediting bodies and through this assessment reporting process.
Ongoing reporting is integral to moving Marywood University forward in the following ways: